4.6 Article

Development of Green Supermarket Evaluation Model Based on Green Process and Green Output-Case of Bangkok City

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141710745

Keywords

green supermarket; evaluation model development; green process; green output; green indicator

Funding

  1. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund for Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop a green supermarket evaluation model and provide empirical evidence on its relationship with the green process, green output, and green supermarket. The data included a survey of 190 supermarket branches in Bangkok, Thailand, and interviews with green supermarket management specialists. The findings revealed a three-level model with two elements, nine major indicators, and 101 sub-indicators for evaluating green supermarkets.
The study aimed to develop a green supermarket evaluation model based on a green process and green output to provide empirical evidence on the model's relationship with the green process, green output, and green supermarket. To this end, the study combined data from a survey of one store manager, one facility manager, and three assistant store managers from each of the 190 supermarket branches in Bangkok, Thailand with data from an in-depth interview of a sample group of green supermarket management specialists. The green supermarket evaluation model is divided into three levels, two elements (green process and green output), nine major indicators for green supermarket evaluation, and one hundred one sub-indicators for green supermarket evaluation, according to the findings. The five major indicators of the green process are green procurement, green storage, green service, green transportation and green environmental and energy management system, while the four major indicators of green output are social performance, environmental performance, economic performance, and organization image performance. In addition, the sub-indicator details were also identified for this evaluation model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available