4.4 Article

Detection of Nonglaucomatous Macula Findings With Ganglion Cell Analysis Printouts vs Full Macular Cube Scans

Journal

JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue 10, Pages 1002-1005

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3450

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [EY029058]
  2. CORE grant [P30EY022589]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ganglion cell analysis (GCA) is routinely used to monitor glaucomatous damage, but a full macular cube scan provides more information about nonglaucomatous ocular pathology.
IMPORTANCE Ganglion cell analysis (GCA) of ocular coherence tomography (OCT) imaging is routinely used to detect and monitor glaucomatous damage of the ganglion cell complex in the macula. The GCA printout provides qualitative and quantitative data about the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and a single B-scan of the retina through the fovea. However, the full macular cube scan, including all 128 B-scans, is available for review. The macular cube scan provides considerable information about nonglaucomatous ocular pathology that may be missed if clinicians review only the GCA printout. OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency and type of nonglaucomatous macular findings that are observable in the full macular cube scan but not the GCA printout. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of GCA printouts and full macular cube scans to detect nonglaucomatous macular pathology at a tertiary care academic center. Consecutive patients undergoing ganglion cell complex imaging during routine glaucoma evaluations over a 1-week period in a multi-clinician glaucoma clinic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The prevalence and type of nonglaucomatous macular pathology visible on the GCA printout or macular cube scan. RESULTS Among 105 patients (mean (SD) age, 67 (15.46) years; 63 [60%] female and 42 [40%] male) 201 eyes were imaged (64 [31.7%] with suspected glaucoma, 126 [62.4%] with open-angle glaucoma, 6 [3.0%] with closed-angle glaucoma, and 6 [3.0%] with other glaucoma). GCA printouts and macular cube scans revealed nonglaucomatous macular pathology in 65 eyes (32.2%). Of these, 25 eyes (38.5%) included findings that were not visible on the GCA printout. Of the cases not visible on the printout, 16 eyes (64.0%) included macular pathology that required further evaluation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings indicate that nonglaucomatous macular pathology may be missed based on GCA printouts alone. While it may be beneficial to review the full macular cube to detect potentially vision-threatening disease and ensure proper patient care, this study cannot determine if this missed pathology affects clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available