4.4 Article

SMEFT analysis of mW

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)308

Keywords

Electroweak Precision Physics; SMEFT

Funding

  1. UK STFC [ST/P000681/1, ST/P000258/1, ST/T000759/1]
  2. Estonian Research Council [MOBTT5]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme [950246]
  4. STFC [ST/T000694/1]
  5. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2020-113644GB-I00]
  6. Branco Weiss Society in Science Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses the Fitmaker tool to fit the recent mW measurement with other data in SMEFT using linear order. The results show that including certain SMEFT operators could provide a better fit than the Standard Model. The study also discusses the possible single-field extensions that could generate these operators and analyzes the masses and couplings of these fields.
We use the Fitmaker tool to incorporate the recent CDF measurement of mW in a global fit to electroweak, Higgs, and diboson data in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) including dimension-6 operators at linear order. We find that including any one of the SMEFT operators O-HWB, O-HD, O (l) (l) or O ((3)) (H l) with a non-zero coefficient could provide a better fit than the Standard Model, with the strongest pull for O-HD and no tension with other electroweak precision data. We then analyse which tree-level single-field extensions of the Standard Model could generate such operator coefficients with the appropriate sign, and discuss the masses and couplings of these fields that best fit the CDF measurement and other data. In particular, the global fit favours either a singlet Z 0 vector boson, a scalar electroweak triplet with zero hypercharge, or a vector electroweak triplet with unit hypercharge, followed by a singlet heavy neutral lepton, all with masses in the multi-TeV range for unit coupling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available