4.4 Article

M5-branes probing flux backgrounds

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2022)122

Keywords

Anomalies in Field and String Theories; Global Symmetries; Discrete Symmetries

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-2112699]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework: ERC Consolidator Grant [682608]
  3. STFC Consolidated Grant [ST/T000864/1]
  4. Simons Collaboration on Global Categorical Symmetries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the global symmetries and anomalies of 4d N = 1 field theories arising from a stack of N M5-branes probing a class of flux backgrounds are analyzed. The setup defines a non-trivial superconformal field theory (SCFT) in the IR for k = 2, with a holographic dual to an explicit AdS(5) solution. By adopting anomaly inflow methods, the groundwork for a systematic analysis of the generalization to k >= 3 is laid out in this study.
We analyze the global symmetries and anomalies of 4d N = 1 field theories that arise from a stack of N M5-branes probing a class of flux backgrounds. These backgrounds consist of a resolved C-2 /Z(k) singularity fibered over a smooth Riemann surface of genus g >= 2, supported by a non-trivial G(4)-flux configuration labeled by a collection of 2(k -1) flux quanta, {N-i}. For k = 2, this setup defines a non-trivial superconformal field theory (SCFT) in the IR, which is holographically dual to an explicit AdS(5) solution first described by Gauntlett, Martelli, Sparks, and Waldram. The generalization to k >= 3 is hard to tackle directly within holography. Instead, in this paper we lay the groundwork for a systematic analysis of such a generalization by adopting anomaly inflow methods to identify continuous and discrete global symmetries of the 4d field theories. We also compute the 't Hooft anomalies for continuous symmetries at leading order in the limit of large N, N-i.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available