4.4 Article

Neutron star heating in dark matter models for the muon g-2 discrepancy

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2022)088

Keywords

Models for Dark Matter; Vector-Like Fermions; Particle Nature of Dark Matter; Specific BSM Phenomenology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work discusses the temperature observation of neutron stars as a promising way to probe models with weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs) coupled to muons. By efficiently capturing WIMPs through DM-muon or spin-dependent DM-nucleon scattering, neutron stars can exhibit a surface temperature much higher than predicted by the standard cooling theory. This effect is observable in old neutron stars and can provide insights into the parameters of such models.
The observed value of the muon magnetic dipole moment, which deviates from the Standard Model prediction by 4.2 sigma, can be explained in models with weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs) coupled to muons. However, a considerable range of parameter space of such models will remain unexplored in the future LHC experiments and dark matter (DM) direct searches. In this work we discuss the temperature observation of neutron stars (NSs) as a promising way to probe such models given that WIMPs are efficiently captured by NSs through DM-muon or spin-dependent DM-nucleon scattering. The captured WIMPs eventually annihilate in the star core and heat the NS. This effect can be observed in old NSs as it keeps the NS surface temperature at a few thousand K at most, which is much higher than the predicted values of the standard NS cooling theory for NSs older than similar to 10(7) years. We consider two classes of representative models, where the DM couples or does not couple to the Higgs field at tree level, and show that the maximal DM heating is realized in both scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available