4.4 Article

Mapping the SMEFT to discoverable models

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2022)229

Keywords

SMEFT; Other Weak Scale BSM Models

Funding

  1. Generalitat Valenciana [GRISOLIAP/2020/145, PROMETEO/2021/083]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2020-113644GB-I00]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Fellowship
  4. [PID2020-113775GB-I00]
  5. [CIPROM/2021/054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a diagrammatic technique for constructing UV models that can generate specific SMEFT operators. It explores the potential discovery of relatively light particles through LHC direct searches in scenarios where the models only contribute to 4F operators at the one-loop order. The study also reveals an interesting interplay between indirect SMEFT and direct searches.
The matching of specific new physics scenarios onto the SMEFT framework is a well-understood procedure. The inverse problem, the matching of the SMEFT to UV scenarios, is more difficult and requires the development of new methods to perform a systematic exploration of models. In this paper we use a diagrammatic technique to construct in an automated way a complete set of possible UV models (given certain, well specified assumptions) that can produce specific groups of SMEFT operators, and illustrate its use by generating models with no tree-level contributions to four-fermion (4F) operators. Those scenarios, which only contribute to 4F at one-loop order, can contain relatively light particles that could be discovered at the LHC in direct searches. For this class of models, we find an interesting interplay between indirect SMEFT and direct searches. We discuss some examples on how this interplay would look like when combining low-energy observables with the SMEFT Higgs-fermion analyses and searches for resonance at the LHC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available