4.5 Article

Verification of a real-time ensemble-based method for updating earth model based on GAN

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101876

Keywords

Geosteering; Machine learning; Deep neural network; Generative Adversarial Network; Ensemble randomized maximum likelihood

Funding

  1. University of Stavanger
  2. University of Bergen - Aker BP ASA
  3. ConocoPhillips Skandinavia AS
  4. Lundin Energy Norway AS
  5. TotalEnergies EP Norge AS, Var Energi ASA
  6. Wintershall Dea Norge AS
  7. Research Council of Norway
  8. Aker BP ASA
  9. Equinor Energy AS, Var Energi ASA
  10. Baker Hughes Norge AS
  11. [309589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a method that uses GANs for parameterization and generation of geomodels, combined with EnRML for rapid updating of subsurface uncertainty. It illustrates the predictive ability of EnRML on assimilating well log data through several examples and verifies the results statistically using MCMC.
The complexity of geomodelling workflows is a limiting factor for quantifying and updating uncertainty in real-time during drilling. We propose Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for parametrization and generation of geomodels, combined with Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood (EnRML) for rapid updating of subsurface uncertainty. This real-time ensemble method is known to be approximate for non-linear forward models and might therefore produce inaccurate and/or biased posterior solutions when combined with a highly non-linear model arising from the neural-network modeling sequences. This paper illustrates the predictive ability of EnRML on several examples where we assimilate local extra-deep electromagnetic logs. Statistical verification with MCMC confirms that the proposed workflow can produce reliable results required for geosteering wells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available