4.6 Article

A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for the Clique Partitioning Problem

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 52, Issue 9, Pages 9391-9403

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3051243

Keywords

Partitioning algorithms; Statistics; Sociology; Optimization; Search problems; Evolutionary computation; Benchmark testing; Clique partitioning; crossover; hybrid evolutionary search method; local optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61802049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new evolutionary algorithm that combines dedicated crossover operator and simulated annealing approach shows remarkable performance in solving clique partitioning problem. The algorithm's key ingredients have been analyzed to understand their impact on performance.
The clique partitioning problem (CPP) of an edge-weighted complete graph is to partition the vertex set V into k disjoint subsets such that the sum of the edge weights within all cliques induced by the subsets is as large as possible. The problem has a number of practical applications in areas, such as data mining, engineering, and bioinformatics, and is, however, computationally challenging. To solve this NP-hard problem, we propose the first evolutionary algorithm that combines a dedicated merge-divide crossover operator to generate offspring solutions and an effective simulated annealing-based local optimization procedure to find high-quality local optima. The extensive experiments on three sets of 94 benchmark instances (including two sets of 63 classical benchmark instances and one new set of 31 large benchmark) show a remarkable performance of the proposed approach compared to the state-of-the-art methods. We analyze the key algorithmic ingredients to shed light on their impacts on the performance of the algorithm. The algorithm and its available source code can benefit people working on practical problems related to CPP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available