4.6 Article

Two-Fold Personalized Feedback Mechanism for Social Network Consensus by Uninorm Interval Trust Propagation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 11081-11092

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3076420

Keywords

Social networking (online); Decision making; Numerical models; Mathematical model; Linguistics; Fuzzy sets; Data science; Consensus; group decision making (GDM); minimum cost; personalized feedback; social network; uninorm interval trust propagation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71971135, 71571166, 71910107002]
  2. Spanish State Research Agency [PID2019-103880RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study establishes a two-fold personalized feedback mechanism in social network group decision-making, which achieves a balance between group consensus and individual personality by generating trusted recommendation advice and personalized adoption coefficients.
A two-fold personalized feedback mechanism is established for consensus reaching in social network group decision-making (SN-GDM). It consists of two stages: 1) generating the trusted recommendation advice for individuals and 2) producing a a personalized adoption coefficient for reducing unnecessary adjustment costs. A uninorm interval-valued trust propagation operator is developed to obtain an indirect trust relationship, which is used to generate personalized recommendation advice based on the principle of ``a recommendation being more acceptable the higher the level of trust it derives from.'' An optimization model is built to minimize the total adjustment cost of reaching consensus by determining the personalized feedback adoption coefficient based on individuals' consensus levels. Consequently, the proposed two-fold personalized feedback mechanism achieves a balance between group consensus and individual personality. An example to demonstrate how the proposed two-fold personalized feedback mechanism works is included, which is also used to show its rationality by comparing it with the traditional feedback mechanism in group decision making (GDM).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available