4.6 Article

Size Effect on X-ray Scintillation Performance for Perovskite Nanocrystals Revealed by Mathematical Model

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202201546

Keywords

bandgap; mathematical models; photoluminescence quantum yield; size effects; X-ray scintillators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines a mathematical model and experimental results to analyze the impact of nanocrystal size on optical properties and X-ray scintillation performance. The results show that the surface area and volume of nanocrystals have positive and negative effects on the change rate of the bandgap, respectively. The photoluminescence quantum yield of nanocrystals decreases with decreasing size, and their light yield is significantly influenced by the size of the nanocrystals.
Nanoscintillators (nanocrystals with X-ray scintillation performance) lay a fundamental for their practical application in high-resolution and low-dose medical examination due to their excellent photoelectric properties. The optical properties and scintillation performance of nanocrystals (NCs) can be significantly affected by adjusting their size. However, the mechanism of the size effect of NCs on optical properties and X-ray scintillation performance has not been revealed. Here, a mathematical model and experimental results are combined to demonstrate the impact of the size of NCs on their scintillation performance. The results show that the surface area and volume of NCs exhibit a positive and negative impact on the change rate of the bandgap, respectively. This model further verifies that the photoluminescence quantum yield of NCs decreases with the decrease of their size, and their light yield is remarkably affected by the size of NCs. Overall, this work provides some enlightenment for researchers to design NCs with the appropriate size for their applications in high-performance X-ray scintillation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available