4.8 Article

Spectral phonon thermal properties in graphene nanoribbons

Journal

CARBON
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 915-923

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322603, 51136001, 51356001]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Group [51321002]
  4. US National Science Foundation CAREER Award [1150948]
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1150948] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work provides a comprehensive investigation on the spectral phonon properties in graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) by the normal mode decomposition (NMD) method, considering the effects of edge chirality, width, and temperature. We find that the edge chirality has no significant effect on the phonon relaxation time but has a large influence to the phonon group velocity. As a result, the thermal conductivity of around 707 W/(m K) in the 4.26 nm-wide zigzag GNR at room temperature is higher than that of 467 W/(m K) in the armchair GNR with the same width. As the width decreases or the temperature increases, the thermal conductivity reduces significantly due to the decreasing relaxation times. Good agreement is achieved between the thermal conductivities predicted from the Green-Kubo method and the NMD method. We find that optical phonons dominate the thermal transport in the GNRs while the relative contribution of acoustic phonons to the thermal conductivity is only 10.1% and 13% in the zigzag GNR and the armchair GNR, respectively. Interestingly, the ZA mode is found to contribute only 1-5% to the total thermal transport in GNRs, being much lower than that of 30-70% in single layer graphene. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available