4.7 Article

Unsupervised Cluster-Wise Hyperspectral Band Selection for Classification

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14215374

Keywords

band selection; unsupervised; feature engineering

Funding

  1. French Government [ANR-16-IDEX-0007]
  2. Region Pays de la Loire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hyperspectral image provides detailed information about a scene, but the high dimensionality in the feature space can lead to unreliable classification results. This paper proposes a new dimensionality reduction algorithm that uses an unsupervised band selection technique based on clustering. The algorithm iteratively selects bands based on the parameters of a separating hyperplane, achieving the best separation in the feature space. The proposed method outperformed five other state-of-the-art frameworks in 60% of the experiments, demonstrating its effectiveness.
A hyperspectral image provides fine details about the scene under analysis, due to its multiple bands. However, the resulting high dimensionality in the feature space may render a classification task unreliable, mainly due to overfitting and the Hughes phenomenon. In order to attenuate such problems, one can resort to dimensionality reduction (DR). Thus, this paper proposes a new DR algorithm, which performs an unsupervised band selection technique following a clustering approach. More specifically, the data set was split into a predefined number of clusters, after which the bands were iteratively selected based on the parameters of a separating hyperplane, which provided the best separation in the feature space, in a one-versus-all scenario. Then, a fine-tuning of the initially selected bands took place based on the separability of clusters. A comparison with five other state-of-the-art frameworks shows that the proposed method achieved the best classification results in 60% of the experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available