4.7 Article

Improving the Accuracy of the Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) Ocean Vector Winds

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14174230

Keywords

ocean surface vector wind; variational method; microwave remote sensing; imaging radiometers; scatterometers

Funding

  1. NASA Physical Oceanography Program
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [80NM0018D0004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CCMP Ocean vector wind analysis combines satellite measurements with NWP model data to estimate global ocean vector winds. While accurate at low to moderate wind speeds, it tends to underestimate high winds due to biases between satellite and model winds.
The Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) Ocean vector wind analysis is a level-4 product that uses a variational method to combine satellite retrievals of ocean winds with a background wind field from a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. The result is a spatially complete estimate of global ocean vector winds on six-hour intervals that are closely tied to satellite measurements. The current versions of CCMP are fairly accurate at low to moderate wind speeds (<15 m/s) but are systematically too low at high winds at locations/times where a collocated satellite measurement is not available. This is mainly because the NWP winds tend to be lower than satellite winds, especially at high wind speed. The current long-term CCMP version, version 2.0, also shows spurious variations on interannual to decadal time scales caused by the interaction of satellite/model bias with the varying amount of satellite measurements available as satellite missions begin and end. To alleviate these issues, here we explore methods to adjust the source datasets to more closely match each other before they are combined. The resultant new CCMP wind analysis agrees better with long-term trend estimates from satellite observations and reanalysis than previous versions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available