4.7 Article

An Innovative Auxetic Honeycomb Sandwich Tube: Fabrication and Mechanical Properties

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14204369

Keywords

auxetic honeycomb; sandwich structures; Poisson's ratio; failure mode

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundations of Jiangsu Province [BK2019057]
  2. General Project of Social Development in Jiangsu Province [BE2020716]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a honeycomb cylindrical shell was prepared to overcome the fracture problem of the hexagonal honeycomb during rolling. The honeycomb sandwich tubes (AHSTs) with a variable Poisson's ratio were successfully fabricated and showed excellent mechanical properties as a core for sandwich structures.
In this study, based on the free-rolling mechanism of the auxetic honeycomb, a honeycomb cylindrical shell was successfully prepared to overcome the fracture problem of the hexagonal honeycomb during rolling. Auxetic honeycomb sandwich tubes (AHSTs) with a variable Poisson's ratio were fabricated by molding and bonding. A Poisson's ratio model of the auxetic honeycomb core was developed based on the strain increment ratio of the deformed honeycomb and validated using computed tomography (CT). Four failure modes (progressive stable fold mode I, unstable local buckling mode II, transverse shearing mode III, and mid-length collapse mode IV) of the AHST were summarized by comparing the deformation behavior and force-displacement curves with different geometric parameters. When the aspect ratio R is greater than 3, the AHST will be more easily damaged in instability (Mode IV). Static compression tests showed that the peak force (PF) and crushing force efficiency (CFE) of the AHST were higher than those of the CFRP thin-walled tube of the same diameter by 78% and 115%, respectively. Therefore, the AHST has excellent mechanical properties and it is feasible to use the auxetic honeycomb as a core for sandwich structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available