4.7 Article

A Methodology to Obtain the Accurate RVEs by a Multiscale Numerical Simulation of the 3D Braiding Process

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14194210

Keywords

3D braiding composite; finite element analysis (FEA); preform; virtual fibers; representative volume element (RVE)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52175360, 51775398]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2021QNRC001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2022T150278, 2022M710062]
  4. 111 Project [B17034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An efficient simulation methodology based on truss elements was used to simulate the 3D four-directional braiding process. The approach was validated through a parametric study, which identified the effect of model input parameters on computation cost and accuracy.
To accurately evaluate the mechanical performance of three-dimensional (3D) braiding composites, it is essential to consider the braiding process and generate realistic representative volume element (RVE) structures. An efficient simulation methodology based on truss elements was used to simulate the 3D four-directional (3D4D) braiding process utilizing the finite element method (FEM) on the macroscale. The goal was to obtain the spatial trajectories of yarns and establish the relationship between the braiding parameters and the preform structure. Based on the initial yarn topology, the yarns were discretized as bundles of virtual sub-yarns. Then, a temperature drop simulation using hybrid elements was implemented to deform the yarn cross-section and obtain the interior, surface, and corner cells on the mesoscale. The simulation results show good agreement with the experiment. A parametric study was deployed to identify the effect of the model input parameters on the computation cost and accuracy. Furthermore, the approach applies to the other braiding processes, such as the cylindrical braiding composite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available