4.3 Article

Associations between maternal metabolic parameters during pregnancy and fetal and child growth trajectories from 20 weeks' gestation to 5 years of age: Secondary analysis from the ROLO longitudinal birth cohort study

Journal

PEDIATRIC OBESITY
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12976

Keywords

child growth; fetal growth; glucose; growth trajectories; insulin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the association between maternal metabolic parameters in pregnancy and growth trajectories up to 5 years of age. Data from the ROLO study were analyzed, and no strong evidence of associations between maternal metabolic parameters and fetal to childhood weight and abdominal circumference trajectories was found.
Objective To examine the association between maternal metabolic parameters in pregnancy and growth trajectories up to 5 years of age. Methods Data from mother-child pairs who participated in the ROLO study, a randomized trial examining the impact of a low glycaemic index diet on the recurrence of macrosomia, were analysed. Fetal and child growth trajectories were developed from longitudinal measurements from 20 weeks gestation up to 5 years of age. We examined associations between maternal fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR and leptin, taken in early pregnancy (14-16 weeks) and late pregnancy (28 weeks), and weight (kg) and abdominal circumference (cm) trajectories using linear spline multilevel models. Results We found no strong evidence of associations between any maternal metabolic parameters and fetal to childhood weight and abdominal circumference trajectories from 20 weeks gestation to 5 years. Conclusion In a cohort of women with obesity with infants at risk of macrosomia, maternal metabolic markers were not strongly associated with trajectories of weight or abdominal circumference from 20 weeks gestation to 5 years of age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available