4.5 Article

Preserving avian blood and DNA sampled in the wild: A survey of personal experiences

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9232

Keywords

birds; blood sampling; DNA; long-term storage; molecular ecology

Funding

  1. Narodowe Centrum Nauki [2016/21/B/NZ8/03082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the problems encountered by researchers in collecting and storing blood samples and DNA extracts from wild birds. It was found that storage of blood samples affected DNA quality and quantity, but was not related to season of blood sampling, access to equipment, transportation, and storage methods. However, storage time before DNA extraction and extraction methods did not affect the final DNA quality and quantity.
Collecting and storing biological material from wild animals in a way that does not deteriorate DNA quality for subsequent analyses is instrumental for research in ecology and evolution. Our aims were to gather reports on the effectiveness of methods commonly used by researchers for the field collection and long-term storage of blood samples and DNA extracts from wild birds. Personal experiences were collected with an online survey targeted specifically at researchers sampling wild birds. Many researchers experienced problems with blood sample storage but not with DNA extract storage. Storage issues generated problems with obtaining adequate DNA quality and sufficient DNA quantity for the targeted molecular analyses but were not related to season of blood sampling, access to equipment, transporting samples, temperature, and method of blood storage. Final DNA quality and quantity were also not affected by storage time before DNA extraction or the methods used to extract DNA. We discuss practical aspects of field collection and storage and provide some general recommendations, with a list of pros and cons of different preservation methods of avian blood samples and DNA extracts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available