4.6 Article

Molecular dynamics simulations of the structure and mechanical properties of silica glass using ReaxFF

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 51, Issue 22, Pages 10139-10159

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-0242-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Army Research Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessment of the empirical reactive force field ReaxFF to predict the formation of amorphous silica from its crystalline structure and the determination of mechanical properties under tension using molecular dynamics simulations is presented. Detailed procedures for preparing amorphous silica from crystalline silica are presented and the atomic structure is in good agreement with experimental results. Tensile properties of silica are predicted over a wide range of strain rates (2.3 x 10(8) s(-1)-1.0 x 10(15) s(-1)) allowing comparison with results reported in the literature for other force fields. Quasi-static modulus obtained from power-law fitting of the low-stain rate modulus predicted by ReaxFF is in good agreement with experimental results. A transition strain rate of approximately is identified where modulus increases rapidly to a plateau level. Tensile strength also increases significantly in this range of strain rate and plateaus at the theoretical upper bound for silica. A detailed study is presented to understand the mechanisms associated with strain rate effects on the overall stress-strain response of silica. Bond breakage which evolves into void growth leading to failure is predicted to occur at approximately 27 % strain for all strain rates. Stress relaxation simulations indicates that the transition strain rate occurs when the characteristic time for high-strain rate loading and stress relaxation times are the same order. The effects of cooling rate and temperature on the structure and the stress-strain response of the silica glass are also investigated. Low-cooling rate and low-cooling temperature enhance the properties of silica.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available