4.1 Article

Integrated Occupational Therapy Camp for Children with Regulation/Sensory Processing Differences: Preliminary Evaluation

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00084174221129941

Keywords

pediatric occupational therapy; sensory-motor integration; neurodevelopment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the effects of integrating occupational therapy into a camp setting for children with regulation/sensory processing differences. The results show that there was significant improvement in occupational performance during the camp, which exceeded the change observed in the three months prior. The improvements remained stable three months after the camp, suggesting the benefits of integrating occupational therapy into a camp environment for children with neurodevelopmental differences.
Background. Integration of occupational therapy into a camp environment may support participation for children with neurodevelopmental differences, but evidence is limited. Purpose. This study examines the effects of participation of children with regulation/sensory processing differences at one such integrated camp on parent-established functional goals. Method. We used a pre-test/post-test repeated measures cohort design. Individualized goals were established with parents three months before camp using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (n = 82, child ages 4-13). Parents re-rated goals immediately before, one month after, and three months after camp. Findings. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed improvement in occupational performance over the week of camp significantly exceeded change within the three months prior. Improvements remained stable three months post-camp. Implications. Integrating occupational therapy within a camp setting is beneficial for children with neurodevelopmental differences. The COPM can be integrated into a camp setting to document meaningful change in individualized parent-established goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available