Journal
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 378, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068921
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIH/NIMHD [1R01MD011501]
- Doctoral and Postdoctoral Office at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University
- NIH [U01 CA176726, U01 CA167552, R00 CA215314, MRSG-17-220-01-NEC]
- American Cancer Society [1R01MD011501]
- [UM1 CA186107]
- [P01 CA87969]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of colorectal cancer among men and women. The study found that men with the highest consumption of ultra-processed foods had a 29% higher risk of developing colorectal cancer, while no association was observed among women. Further analysis showed that certain subgroups of ultra-processed foods were associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in both men and women.
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of colorectal cancer among men and women from three large prospective cohorts. DESIGN Prospective cohort study with dietary intake assessed every four years using food frequency questionnaires. SETTING Three large US cohorts. PARTICIPANTS Men (n= 46 341) from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) and women (n=159 907) from the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2014; n=67 425) and the Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2015; n=92 482) with valid dietary intake measurement and no cancer diagnosis at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer, estimated using time varying Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTs 3216 cases of colorectal cancer (men, n=1294; women, n=1922) were documented during the 24-28 years of follow-up. Compared with those in the lowest fifth of ultra-processed food consumption, men in the highest fifth of consumption had a 29% higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.53; P for trend=0.01), and the positive association was limited to distal colon cancer (72% increased risk; hazard ratio 1.72, 1.24 to 2.37; P for trend < 0.001). These associations remained significant after further adjustment for body mass index or indicators of nutritional quality of the diet (that is, western dietary pattern or dietary quality score). No association was observed between overall ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer among women. Among subgroups of ultra-processed foods, higher consumption of meat/ poultry/seafood based ready-to-eat products (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.44, 1.20 to 1.73; P for trend < 0.001) and sugar sweetened beverages (1.21, 1.01 to 1.44; P for trend=0.013) among men and ready-to-eat/heat mixed dishes among women (1.17, 1.01 to 1.36; P for trend=0.02) was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer; yogurt and dairy based desserts were negatively associated with the risk of colorectal cancer among women (hazard ratio 0.83, 0.71 to 0.97; P for trend=0.002). CONCLUSIONS In the three large prospective cohorts, high consumption of total ultra-processed foods in men and certain subgroups of ultra-processed foods in men and women was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to better understand the potential attributes of ultra-processed foods that contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available