4.5 Article

Bias by censoring for competing events in survival analysis

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Medicine, General & Internal

Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods

Nan van Geloven et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2022)

Article Surgery

Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure

Maarten Naesens et al.

Summary: Late graft failure in kidney transplant recipients is often multifactorial, and the primary endpoints of kidney transplantation studies focus on short-term efficacy and safety of clinical interventions. Short-term improvements in specific aspects of graft function or rejection rates may not necessarily lead to meaningful long-term graft survival benefits, and combining multiple factors into a well-validated model is more likely to predict long-term outcomes. Consideration of conditional marketing authorization for therapies aiming to improve long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation highlights the need for clearer definitions of surrogate endpoints in clinical trial settings.

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL (2022)

Article Immunology

Competing Risk Analysis in Renal Allograft Survival: A New Perspective to an Old Problem

Mireille El Ters et al.

Summary: By comparing the Kaplan-Meier method with competing risk analysis, it was found that competing risk analysis provides more accurate estimates of long-term kidney transplant recipient survival and graft loss probabilities, especially in subgroups with higher rates of competing events.

TRANSPLANTATION (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Estimating restricted mean survival time and expected life-years lost in the presence of competing risks within flexible parametric survival models

Sarwar I. Mozumder et al.

Summary: Royston-Parmar flexible parametric survival models can be used to predict restricted mean failure time and expected life-years lost due to a cause of death in the presence of competing risks. These predictions aid in interpretation of competing risks analysis, especially when the proportional hazards assumption is questionable.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to simultaneously estimate the absolute risk of different event types: Cumulative total failure probability may exceed 1

Peter C. Austin et al.

Summary: The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model is commonly used to estimate outcomes over time in the presence of competing risks, but may result in predictions exceeding 100% in certain scenarios. Care should be taken when applying this model, particularly in situations with wide risk distributions or high cumulative incidence, and when interested in the risk of failure from different event types.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Hidden Imputations and the Kaplan-Meier Estimator

Stephen R. Cole et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Influence of Mortality on Estimating the Risk of Kidney Failure in People with Stage 4 CKD

Pietro Ravani et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY (2019)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Allocation of deceased donor kidneys: A review of international practices

Darren Lee et al.

NEPHROLOGY (2019)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Relative rates not relative risks: addressing a widespread misinterpretation of hazard ratios

Rinku Sutradhar et al.

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Simulation shows undesirable results for competing risks analysis with time-dependent covariates for clinical outcomes

Inga Poguntke et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2018)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks

Peter C. Austin et al.

CIRCULATION (2016)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Covariate adjustment of cumulative incidence functions for competing risks data using inverse probability of treatment weighting

Anke Neumann et al.

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE (2016)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals

Carl van Walraven et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Editorial Material Transplantation

Competing risks: you only die once

David G. Warnock

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2016)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Competing risks analyses: objectives and approaches

Marcel Wolbers et al.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Interpreting and comparing risks in the presence of competing events

Martin Wolkewitz et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)

Article Transplantation

When do we need competing risks methods for survival analysis in nephrology?

Marlies Noordzij et al.

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION (2013)

Article Immunology

The collaborative transplant study registry

Gerhard Opelz et al.

TRANSPLANTATION REVIEWS (2013)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified

Nadine Grambauer et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2010)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Prognostic Models With Competing Risks Methods and Application to Coronary Risk Prediction

Marcel Wolbers et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?

Karel G. M. Moons et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Actual and actuarial probabilities of competing risks: Apples and lemons

Gary L. Grunkemeier et al.

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2007)