4.6 Review

Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062990

Keywords

GYNAECOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [197831, 160909]
  2. Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship Grant (2018-2021)
  3. Australian Award/UNSW UIPA scholarship
  4. Women And Newborns Trial of Antenatal Interventions and Management (WANTAIM) trial (ISRCTN) - DFID/MRC/Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials [ISRCTN37134032]
  5. Australian NHMRC Grant
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. r4d programme (Swiss Programme for Research on Global Issues for Development) [IZ07Z0-160909]
  8. Australian NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review investigates the role of genital mycoplasmas in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, alone or in combination with bacterial vaginosis (BV). The available literature does not provide conclusive evidence, highlighting the need for future studies that consider the interaction between genital mycoplasmas and the vaginal microbiome.
Objectives Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum (genital mycoplasmas) commonly colonise the urogenital tract in pregnant women. This systematic review aims to investigate their role in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, alone or in combination with bacterial vaginosis (BV). Methods We searched Embase, Medline and CINAHL databases from January 1971 to February 2021. Eligible studies tested for any of the three genital mycoplasmas during pregnancy and reported on the primary outcome, preterm birth (PTB) and/or secondary outcomes low birth weight (LBW), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), spontaneous abortion (SA) and/or perinatal or neonatal death (PND). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, read potentially eligible full texts and extracted data. Two reviewers independently assessed risks of bias using published checklists. Random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate summary ORs (with 95% CIs and prediction intervals). Multivariable and stratified analyses were synthesised descriptively. Results Of 57/1194 included studies, 39 were from high-income countries. In meta-analysis of unadjusted ORs, M. hominis was associated with PTB (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.34), PROM, LBW and PND but not SA. U. urealyticum was associated with PTB (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.55), PROM, LBW, SA and PND. U. parvum was associated with PTB (1.60, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.30), PROM and SA. Nine of 57 studies reported any multivariable analysis. In two studies, analyses stratified by BV status showed that M. hominis and U. parvum were more strongly associated with PTB in the presence than in the absence of BV. The most frequent source of bias was a failure to control for confounding. Conclusions The currently available literature does not allow conclusions about the role of mycoplasmas in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, alone or with coexisting BV. Future studies that consider genital mycoplasmas in the context of the vaginal microbiome are needed. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016050962.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available