4.5 Article

Diagnosis of pathogens causing bacterial meningitis using Nanopore sequencing in a resource-limited setting

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12941-022-00530-6

Keywords

Nanopore; Bacterial meningitis; Vietnam; 16S rRNA; Next-generation sequencing; Diagnosis and pathogen genome

Categories

Funding

  1. PAN-ASEAN Coalition for Epidemic and Outbreak Preparedness (PACE-UP
  2. DAAD) [57592343]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF01DP17047]
  4. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 16S rRNA Nanopore sequencing and conventional culture in detecting infectious pathogens in patients with suspected meningitis in a resource-limited setting. The results showed that both methods yielded concordant results in the majority of patients, but Nanopore sequencing had higher sensitivity. The use of both Nanopore sequencing and culture significantly increased the pathogen detection rate, making it an important tool for low- and middle-income countries without extensive bioinformatics expertise.
Aim The aim of the present study is to compare the performance of 16S rRNA Nanopore sequencing and conventional culture in detecting infectious pathogens in patients with suspected meningitis in a resource-limited setting without extensive bioinformatics expertise. Methods DNA was isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 30 patients with suspected bacterial meningitis. The isolated DNA was subjected to 16S sequencing using MinION (TM). The data were analysed in real time via the EPI2ME cloud platform. The Nanopore sequencing was done in parallel to routine microbiological diagnostics. Results Nanopore sequencing detected bacterial pathogens to species level in 13 of 30 (43%) samples. CSF culture showed 40% (12/30) positivity. In 21 of 30 patients (70%) with suspected bacterial meningitis, both methods yielded concordant results. About nine of 30 samples showed discordant results, of these five were false positive and four were false negative. In five of the culture negative results, nanopore sequencing was able to detect pathogen genome, due to the higher sensitivity of the molecular diagnostics. In two other samples, the CSF culture revealed Cryptococcus neoformans and Streptococcus pneumoniae, which were not detected by Nanopore sequencing. Overall, using both the cultures and 16S Nanopore sequencing, positivity rate increased from 40% (12/30) to 57% (17/30). Conclusion Next-generation sequencing could detect pathogens within six hours and could become an important tool for both pathogen screening and surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that do not have direct access to extensive bioinformatics expertise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available