☆ 4.5 Article

Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Diseases: A Matched Case-Control

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2022)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Clinical Neurology

Endo-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF in 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis: A prospective randomized pilot study

You Lv et al.

Summary: This study compared the effectiveness of traditional minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and optimized Endoscopic TLIF techniques for 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis. The results showed that Endo-TLIF surgery with a C-shaped working tube and a visualization system was an efficient alternative with satisfactory clinical outcomes.

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Review

Jeffrey N. Katz et al.

Summary: Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back and leg pain in older individuals, affecting approximately 103 million people worldwide. Most cases are treated nonoperatively, but surgery is an effective option for patients who do not improve with conservative management.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Meng Ge et al.

Summary: This study compared hidden blood loss (HBL), visible blood loss (VBL), and total blood loss (TBL) following Endo-TLIF and Mis-TLIF and evaluated the clinical significance of these procedures. The results showed that Endo-TLIF significantly reduced HBL, VBL, and TBL compared to Mis-TLIF and had better short-term clinical outcomes. However, there were no significant differences in long-term clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and peri-operative complications between the two groups.

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Seong Son et al.

Summary: Endo-LIF has favorable immediate outcomes in terms of blood loss and back pain compared to MIS-TLIF, but it has a longer operation time and limited surgical indication.

JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Xiao-bing Zhao et al.

Summary: Comparing the clinical efficacy of Endo-TLIF with PPSs and MIS-TLIF for the treatment of degenerative LSS, it was found that the former group had lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay, with significant improvement in postoperative pain. There were no significant differences in intervertebral fusion rates and clinical satisfaction between the Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF groups.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Hao Zhang et al.

Summary: This study compared the preliminary postoperative outcomes of Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, finding that Endo-TLIF had less blood loss and shorter ambulation time, with significant early improvement. There were no significant differences in terms of interbody fusion rates between the two groups, and no serious postoperative complications were observed.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

A Modified Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique: Preliminary Clinical Results of 96 Cases

Junfeng Gong et al.

Summary: The study demonstrated satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes among patients who underwent Endo-TLIF treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases, indicating that Endo-TLIF is efficient and safe for select patients.

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

The technical feasibility and preliminary results of minimally invasive endoscopic-TLIF based on electromagnetic navigation: a case series

Derong Xu et al.

Summary: Electromagnetic navigation can improve the surgical efficiency of percutaneous pedicle screw placement and endoscopic decompression in Endo-TLIF, resulting in reduced radiation exposures. The study showed significant improvements in VAS score and ODI in all patients at the follow-up.

BMC SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuanqiao Kou et al.

Summary: A comparison between Endo-LIF and MIS-TLIF in treating lumbar degenerative diseases showed no significant differences in complication, reoperation, and fusion rates, as well as preoperative and postoperative pain scores and disability index. Endo-LIF had the advantage of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and better long-term functional outcome compared to MIS-TLIF, despite a longer operative time.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Larry E. Miller et al.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Analysis of clinical efficacy of endo-LIF in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases

Wenjie Wu et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in patients with degenerative spinal disease

Yasuchika Aoki et al.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion

Chi Heon Kim et al.

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up

John Paul G. Kolcun et al.

NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Definition, Natural History, Conservative Management, and Surgical Treatment

Mohamad Bydon et al.

NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF

David H. Ge et al.

SPINE (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF): technical note

Myung Soo Youn et al.

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up

Michael Y. Wang et al.

NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Paul G. Matz et al.

SPINE JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis

Scott L. Parker et al.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

Frederic Jacquot et al.

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2013)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update)

D. Scott Kreiner et al.

SPINE JOURNAL (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease

Antonio Tsahtsarlis et al.

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2012)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.