4.8 Article

Plasma-assisted synthesis of carbon encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles with controlled sizes correlated to smooth variation of magnetic properties

Journal

CARBON
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 24-37

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports rapid, continuous and carbon-nanotube free synthesis of carbon encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles by thermal-plasma expansion technique, which combines the typical advantages of high-temperature plasma assisted synthesis method with efficient particle-size control. Core nanocrystals were encapsulated with few layers of graphitized carbon, which could provide protection against both oxidation and intense chemical treatment. The average iron/iron-carbide nanoparticle diameter (7.7, 9 and 10 nm) and the width of the size distribution increased with pressure in the sample collection chamber, as a result of the decreasing quenching rate of the plasma jet. This also resulted in the smaller particles remaining frozen predominantly in the high-temperature gamma-Fe phases, part of which was oxidized subsequently and eliminated preferentially during the purification process. All samples could be correlated with smooth variation of magnetic properties; saturation magnetization, remnant magnetization and coercive-field enhancing with increasing chamber pressure or average particle size. The low pressure synthesized sample with smallest average particle size approached super-paramagnetic behavior (saturation magnetization = 51.8 emu/g, ratio of remnant to saturation magnetization = 4.9 and coercive field = 52 Oe), which may be ideal for biomedical applications. High-pressure samples on the other hand have a higher saturation magnetization (76.3 emu/g) and coercive fields (123 Oe). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available