4.5 Article

First principles and experimental studies of empty Si46 as anode materials for Li-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 23, Pages 3657-3665

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2016.408

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Internal Research and Development Program of Southwest Research Institute(R) (SwRI(R)) [18.R9890]
  2. Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) [DEAC0205CH11231]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1206795]
  4. startup funds from the Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University (ASU)
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1206795] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this investigation was to utilize the first-principles molecular dynamics computational approach to investigate the lithiation characteristics of empty silicon clathrates (Si-46) for applications as potential anode materials in lithium-ion batteries. The energy of formation, volume expansion, and theoretical capacity were computed for empty silicon clathrates as a function of Li. The theoretical results were compared against experimental data of long-term cyclic tests performed on half-cells using electrodes fabricated from Si-46 prepared using a Hofmann-type elimination-oxidation reaction. The comparison revealed that the theoretically predicted capacity (of 791.6 mAh/g) agreed with experimental data (809 mAh/g) that occurred after insertion of 48 Li atoms. The calculations showed that overlithiation beyond 66 Li atoms can cause large volume expansion with a volume strain as high as 120%, which may correlate to experimental observations of decreasing capacities from the maximum at 1030 mAh/g to 553 mA h/g during long-term cycling tests. The finding suggests that overlithiation beyond 66 Li atoms may have caused damage to the cage structure and led to lower reversible capacities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available