4.7 Article

Determinants of university students' COVID-19 vaccination intentions and behavior

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23044-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. BARMER health insurance
  3. JGU Mainz
  4. University Medical Center of the JGU Mainz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vaccination hesitancy is a major challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is a lack of research on determinants of university students' vaccination behavior. This study investigated the likelihood and intention of COVID-19 vaccination among German university students and found that psychological factors, field of study, and trust in/usage of specific media and information channels were important determinants of their vaccination decision.
Vaccination hesitancy has been a major challenge for health authorities and societies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The general determinants of vaccination intentions and behavior include sociodemographic and health-related, psychological, and communication-related factors, with varying relevance for different types of vaccinations, countries, and target groups. The predictors of university students' COVID-19 vaccination behavior have not been sufficiently studied. Using a German university as an example and based on an online survey of 1398 university students, we investigated factors related to (a) the likelihood of vaccination against COVID-19 and (b) vaccination intention among those who had not been vaccinated by summer of 2021. Psychological factors showed high relevance. Field of study, trust in, and use of certain media and information channels were found to be important determinants of students' vaccination decision. Our findings can help better understand university students' vaccination behavior to develop and implement tailored strategies and campaigns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available