4.7 Article

Differences in Measured and Self-Categorized Food Security Status and Related Coping Strategies among College Students

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14173569

Keywords

food insecurity; nutrition insecurity; coping strategies; college students; obesity; young adults; USDA AFSSM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Qualitative studies have shown that college students may misinterpret the Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM) questions, leading to misclassification of food security status. This study examines the differences between AFSSM-measured food security status and self-categorized food security status among college students, and explores the impact on coping strategies and BMI. The results suggest that self-perception and interpretation of survey questions play a significant role in food security measurement among college students.
Qualitative studies suggest that college students with food insecurity (FI) experience stigma and misinterpret some of the USDA Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM) questions, leading to misclassification of food security (FS) status. We aimed to evaluate differences in AFSSM-measured FS status and self-categorized FS status (based on USDA descriptions of the four FS levels) among college students, and to identify differences in the coping strategies and BMI of these students. Data were collected cross-sectionally from a convenience sample via web-based, self-reported surveys. Measured FS, self-categorized FS, coping strategies, and self-reported BMI were key variables of interest. Participants were 1003 undergraduate and graduate students (22.2 +/- 4.6 years; 65.7% female). Of the participants measured as food insecure (40.0%), 57.8% self-categorized as food secure (MFI-SFS) and 42.2% self-categorized as food insecure (MFI-SFI). Significantly more MFI-SFI participants were AFSSM-categorized as having very low FS when compared to MFI-SFS participants (71.6% vs. 46.6%, p < 0.05). MFI-SFI participants reported significantly higher BMI (M = 24.7, SD +/- 6.0 kg/m(2)) and coping strategies scores (M = 49.8, SD +/- 7.5) when compared to MFI-SFS participants (M = 23.1, SD +/- 3.6 kg/m(2); M = 46.9, SD +/- 7.5, respectively, p <= 0.01). Assessment of and interventions to address FI among college students should consider the potential influence of self-perception and students' interpretation of survey questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available