4.7 Article

Association of Folic Acid Supplementation in Early Pregnancy with Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Longitudinal Study

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14194061

Keywords

folic acid; gestational diabetes mellitus; dose; duration; risk

Funding

  1. Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau Project [cstc2018jscx-mszdX0021]
  2. Key Program of National Science Foundation [82130097]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that folic acid supplementation may be a protective factor for the risk of GDM caused by high postprandial blood glucose.
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may lead to many adverse effects on women and their offspring. Method: 24,429 pregnant women were enrolled during early pregnancy from January 2018 to December 2021. The self-reported intake of folic acid supplements was assessed via a questionnaire. Oral glucose tolerance tests were used for the diagnosis of GDM. The association between intake or not, dose, and duration of folic acid and GDM risk was assessed. Results: 6396 (26.18%) women were diagnosed with GDM. In the univariate models, folic acid was found to be correlated with total GDM risk (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70 similar to 0.95, p = 0.009). After adjusting for potential confounders, the association with total GDM risk was not significant, but the association of folic acid with 2-h PBG diagnosed GDM risk was consistently significant (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63 similar to 0.90, p = 0.002). No significant association between the dose and duration of folic acid supplementation and GDM risk was observed in the analyses. Conclusion: Folic acid supplementation might be a protective factor for the risk of GDM caused by the high level of postprandial blood glucose, but the dose or duration-related association between folic acid supplementation and GDM risk is not clear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available