4.7 Article

Reversing Type 2 Diabetes in a Primary Care-Anchored eHealth Lifestyle Coaching Programme in Denmark: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14163424

Keywords

digital behavioural coaching; health behaviour change; interactive advice; lifestyle change; mobile intervention; obesity; quality of life; participant engagement; telemedicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This trial investigated the effects of an eHealth lifestyle coaching programme on weight loss and HbA1c reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. The results showed that the intervention group experienced significant weight loss and decreased HbA1c compared to the control group.
The goal of this trial was to investigate whether an eHealth lifestyle coaching programme led to significant weight loss and decreased Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes. In an RCT, 170 patients were enrolled from 2018 to 2019 for intervention or control. Inclusion criteria were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, BMI 30-45 kg/m(2), and aged 18-70 years. Exclusion criteria were lacks internet access, pregnant or planning a pregnancy, or has a serious disease. Primary and secondary outcomes were a reduction in body weight and HbA1c. At six months, 75 (75%) patients in the intervention group and 53 (76%) patients in the control group remained in the trial. The mean body weight loss was 4.2 kg (95% CI, -5.49; -2.98) in the intervention group and 1.5 kg (95% CI, -2.57; -0.48) in the control group (p = 0.005). In the intervention group, 24 out of 62 patients with elevated HbA1c at baseline (39%) had a normalized HbA1c < 6.5% at six months, compared to 8 out of 40 patients with elevated HbA1c at baseline (20%) in the control group (p = 0.047). The eHealth lifestyle coaching programme can lead to significant weight loss and decreased HbA1c among patients with type 2 diabetes, compared to standard care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available