Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study

The current study aimed to assess the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant (MagiCore (R): MC (R), InnosBioSurg, IBS) and to evaluate its biological behavior compared to a gold standard implant (NobelParallel (TM): NBTM, Nobel Biocare (TM)). After surface characterization, the biological behavior assessment was conducted regarding human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) and osteoblast-like cells (MG63). Roughness values for NB (TM) were Ra = 1.28 mu m and for MC (R) they were Ra = 2.02 mu m. Alamar Blue (TM) assay LIVE/DEAD (TM) staining results indicated equivalent biological development regarding both cell types for the two implants. Significant enhancement was found for hGF ALP activity in the presence of the two tested implants in a time-dependent manner from day 7 to day 14 (**p < 0.01). Alizarin red staining demonstrated significant calcium deposition enhancement when cells were interfaced with the NB (TM) compared to the MC (R) implant (** p < 0.05). Moreover, SEM and confocal imaging revealed good cell adhesion with a denser cellular layer on the MC (R) than the NBTM surface. The MC (R) cytocompatibility was ranked as equivalent to the gold standard implant despite the surface properties differences. These findings provide new insights about the minimally invasive implant's biological behavior and its potential clinical implication in different implantology situations.

Automated summary

This study assessed the topographical and physical properties of a minimally invasive implant and compared its biological behavior to a gold standard implant. The findings showed that both implants exhibited equivalent biological development for human gingival fibroblasts and osteoblast-like cells. In certain aspects, the minimally invasive implant performed better.