4.6 Article

Modeling of Hydrogen Diffusion in Inhomogeneous Steel Welded Joints

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15217686

Keywords

hydrogen; diffusion; weld inhomogeneity; diffusion coefficient; solubility; steel; modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on the impact of hydrogen diffusion in inhomogeneous butt-welded joints, revealing that the peak hydrogen concentration in the HAZ is directly proportional to the initial hydrogen concentration in the weld metal. The use of austenitic welding materials can significantly reduce the hydrogen concentration in the HAZ.
Hydrogen is a main factor in cold cracking or hydrogen-induced cracking. The most crack susceptible region of a steel welded joint is the heat affected zone (HAZ). The formulation and functional-analytical solution of the one-dimensional problem of hydrogen diffusion in an inhomogeneous butt-welded joint considering weld and joint dimensions and initial hydrogen distribution as well as hydrogen diffusion coefficients and solubilities are presented. It is shown that the peak hydrogen concentration in the HAZ of inhomogeneous joints varies in direct proportion to the initial hydrogen concentration in the weld metal. It is inversely proportional to the ratio of hydrogen solubilities in the weld metal and the HAZ metal and is nonlinear in the diffusion coefficient ratio of these metals. The peak hydrogen concentration in the HAZ can exceed 170% of the average initial concentration in the joint if martensitic steel is welded using low-carbon low-alloy welding consumables. The utilization of austenitic consumables leads to a dramatic reduction in the hydrogen concentration in the HAZ in comparison with the non-austenitic consumables. No direct relationship was found between the hydrogen concentration in the HAZ and the hydrogen evolution from the joint surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available