4.6 Article

Experimental Study and Analysis on Workability and Mechanical Performance of High Fluidity Recycled Concrete

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15176104

Keywords

recycled concrete; recycled aggregate; sand ratio; workability; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Key Scientific Research Project of Institution of Higher Education in Henan Province [20A560026]
  2. Training Plan for Young Key Teachers in Institution of Higher Education in Henan Province [2019147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the workability and mechanical performance of high fluidity recycled concrete through parallel tests. The results indicate that the recycled concrete can meet the design requirements and be used in practical engineering within a certain range of recycled aggregate content and sand ratio.
In order to study the workability and mechanical performance of high fluidity recycled concrete, parallel tests were carried out to prepare high fluidity recycled concrete by changing the amount of recycled aggregate (20%, 30%, 40%, 50% and 60%) and the sand ratio (0.37, 0.38, 0.39 and 0.40). The fluidity, compression strength, tensile strength and flexural strength of each mix were tested. The results show that the slump of a recycled concrete mixture is 120 mm when the content of recycled aggregate is less than 30%, and the mechanical strength satisfies the requirement of the high fluidity ordinary concrete. As the ratio of sand increases, the fluidity of the recycled concrete also improved. The best sand ratio is not consistent with the strength index. When the sand ratio is between 0.37 and 0.40 and the content of recycled aggregate is not more than 40%, the concrete of C60 can be prepared. Both the fluidity and the strength index can meet the design requirements and can be used in the practical engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available