4.2 Article

Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1394-1405

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5

Keywords

Age-appropriate formulations; Children; Off-label prescribing; Unlicensed medicines

Funding

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/20072013) [261060]
  2. Alder Hey Children's NHS FT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel tool has been developed and tested to assess the appropriateness of dosage forms for pediatric use and estimate the proportion of formulations considered 'inappropriate' in hospitalized pediatric patients. The tool has shown high inter-rater reliability and can identify medicines that would benefit from improved pediatric formulations.
Background Medicines designed for adults may be inappropriate for use in children in terms of strength, dosage form and/or excipient content. There is currently no standardised method of assessing the age-appropriateness of a medicine for paediatric use. Aim To develop and test a tool to assess whether a dosage form (formulation) is appropriate for children and estimate the proportion of formulations considered 'inappropriate' in a cohort of hospitalised paediatric patients with a chronic illness. Method A multi-phase study: patient data collection, tool development, case assessments and tool validation. Inpatients aged 0-17 years at two UK paediatric/neonatal hospitals during data collection periods between January 2015 and March 2016. Written informed consent/assent was obtained. Medicines assessed were new or regularly prescribed to inpatients as part of their routine clinical care. All medicine administration episodes recorded were assessed using the Age-appropriate Formulation tool. The tool was developed by a consensus approach, as a one-page flowchart. Independent case assessments were evaluated in 2019. Results In 427 eligible children; 2,199 medicine administration episodes were recorded. Two assessors reviewed 220 episodes in parallel: percentage exact agreement was found to be 91.7% (99/108) and 93.1% (95/102). In total, 259/2,199 (11.8%) medicine administration episodes involved a dosage form categorised as 'age-inappropriate'. Conclusion A novel tool has been developed and internally validated. The tool can identify which medicines would benefit from development of an improved paediatric formulation. It has shown high inter-rater reliability between users. External validation is needed to further assess the tool's utility in different settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available