4.0 Review

The microbiome and male infertility: looking into the past to move forward

Journal

HUMAN FERTILITY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 450-462

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2098540

Keywords

Microbiome; male infertility; semen microbiome; testicular microbiome; probiotic; microbiome in ART

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the research on the microbiome of the male reproductive system and explores the potential impact of bacteria on male infertility. The potential benefits of probiotics as an alternative treatment for male infertility are highlighted, and the negative impact of certain bacteria on semen parameters as well as the protective effects of Lactobacillus are addressed.
The human body harbours trillions of microbes, and their influence on human health has been explored in many parts of the human body, including the male reproductive system. From routine culturing to polymerise chain reaction (PCR) and high throughput DNA sequencing, several studies have identified bacteria in the male reproductive system. In this review, we discuss the past and current literature surrounding the testicular and semen microbiome in correlation with male infertility. We further highlight the potential benefits of probiotics as an alternative therapeutic option for male infertility. Although not conclusive, emerging data are indicating potential implications of certain bacterial members on male fertility. There is a general agreement on the negative impact of some pathogenic bacterial species on semen parameters, including sperm counts, motility, morphology, and DNA integrity. On the other hand, Lactobacillus, known as a human-friendly bacteria, has shown protective effects on semen parameters, which makes it a potentially good probiotic. In order to confirm the findings of previous studies, more clinical studies with larger sample sizes and the right controls are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available