4.5 Article

Mechanical properties of two-dimensional sheets of TiO2: a DFT study

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS
Volume 137, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03316-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Zabol [PR-UOZ1400-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the mechanical properties of two different 2D TiO2 nanosheets and compares their responses under strain. It is found that the hexagonal nanosheet is softer than the lepidocrocite nanosheet, and the reason for this difference is analyzed through structural differences. Additionally, the study reveals that both nanosheets exhibit linear responses under small tensile strains.
Materials with a two-dimensional (2D) structure have emerged as an important component of modern technologies. Using 2D materials in many applications results in strain being created in the material. Materials respond to strain in different ways depending on their mechanical properties. The present work examines the mechanical properties of two 2D nanosheets of TiO2, namely hexagonal nanosheet (HNS) and lepidocrocite nanosheet (LNS). In order to accomplish this, we use the stress-strain theory in combination with first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the mechanical characteristics, including stiffness constants, Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, ideal strength, and critical strain. We validate our calculations by obtaining the important mechanical properties of bulk rutile TiO2 and comparing them with the theoretical and experimental values reported by others. Then, we compare the mechanical properties of TiO2 LNS and HNS using the same computational approach. It appears that LNS is stiffer than HNS, so we analyze structural differences between the two in order to determine the reasons for this. It has been observed that under small tensile strains, the responses, including induced stress, transverse contraction, and bond length change, are linear for both HNSs and LNSs. In general, LNS displays anisotropic responses, whereas HNS exhibits isotropic responses under small tensile strains and nearly isotropic responses under higher levels of strain. Finally, we compare the mechanical properties of HNS and LNS with those of graphene, h-BN, phosphorene, and hexagonal antimonene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available