4.8 Article

The unquantified mass loss of Northern Hemisphere marine-terminating glaciers from 2000-2020

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33231-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre for Polar Studies, University of Silesia
  2. Vanier Graduate Scholarship
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. ArcticNet Network of Centres of Excellence Canada
  5. IASC Network on Arctic Glaciology
  6. University of Ottawa
  7. ESA Glaciers CCI project
  8. RG State Contract [FMGE-2019-0004]
  9. NASA [80NSSC20K1296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimated the frontal ablation of marine-terminating glaciers in the Northern Hemisphere and found that these glaciers contributed an average of 44.47 to 51.98 Gt of ice to the ocean annually from 2000 to 2020, making a significant contribution to sea-level rise.
In the Northern Hemisphere, -1500 glaciers, accounting for 28% of glacierized area outside the Greenland Ice Sheet, terminate in the ocean. Glacier mass loss at their ice-ocean interface, known as frontal ablation, has not yet been comprehensively quantified. Here, we estimate decadal frontal ablation from measurements of ice discharge and terminus position change from 2000 to 2020. We bias-correct and cross-validate estimates and uncertainties using independent sources. Frontal ablation of marine-terminating glaciers contributed an average of 44.47 +/- 6.23 Gt a(-1) of ice to the ocean from 2000 to 2010, and 51.98 +/- 4.62 Gt a(-1) from 2010 to 2020. Ice discharge from 2000 to 2020 was equivalent to 2.10 +/- 0.22 mm of sea-level rise and comprised approximately 79% of frontal ablation, with the remainder from terminus retreat. Near-coastal areas most impacted include Austfonna, Svalbard, and central Severnaya Zemlya, the Russian Arctic, and a few Alaskan fjords.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available