4.8 Article

Spectral interpretation of late-stage mare basalt mineralogy unveiled by Chang'E-5 samples

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33670-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZDBS-SSW-JSC007-6]
  2. National Key R & D Project of China [2021YFA0715101]
  3. Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laboratory analyses on the Chang'E-5 lunar soil samples have revealed that lunar late-stage mare basalts contain abundant iron-rich high-Ca pyroxene instead of olivine. This finding is significant for understanding the thermal evolution and young volcanic activities on the Moon.
The western maria of lunar near-side are widely covered with late-stage mare basalts. Due to the lack of returned samples, the mineralogy of the late-stage basalts was previously speculated as having high abundance of olivine based on remote sensing observation. However, here we show that Chang'E-5 (CE-5) lunar soil samples, the ground truth from past unsampled lunar late-stage mare region, give a different interpretation. Our laboratory spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of the CE-5 soil samples demonstrate that their special spectral signatures are representative of iron-rich high-Ca pyroxene rather than olivine. Considering the spectral and compositional similarities between CE-5 soil samples and lunar late-stage basalts, the mineralogy and petrology of CE-5 samples may be able to be generalized to entire lunar late-stage basalts. Our study would provide a constraint on the thermal evolution of the Moon, especially the young lunar volcanism. Laboratory spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction analyses on the Chang'E-5 lunar soil samples have demonstrated that the spectral features of lunar late-stage mare basalts are representative of iron-rich high-Ca pyroxene rather than olivine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available