4.4 Article

Inter-sectoral prioritization of climate technologies: insights from a Technology Needs Assessment for mitigation in Brazil

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-022-10025-6

Keywords

Brazil; Technology Needs Assessment; Mitigation; Multi-criteria analysis; Analytic hierarchy process

Funding

  1. Green Climate Fund (GCF)
  2. National Institute of Science and Technology for Climate Change Phase 2 under CNPq [465501/2014-1]
  3. FAPESP [2014/50848-9, 2018/17714-0]
  4. National Coordination for High Level Education and Training (CAPES) [16/2014]
  5. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technological development is crucial for achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement. Technology Needs Assessments (TNAs) are conducted to identify and prioritize climate change mitigation and adaptation technologies in developing countries. However, there is a lack of literature discussing country-specific processes for TNAs. This paper presents empirical evidence from a tailored TNA project in Brazil, highlighting the importance of country-driven processes in shaping international programs according to specific national needs and capabilities.
Technological development is key for national strategies to cope with the Paris Agreement's goals. Technology Needs Assessments (TNAs) aim to identify, prioritize, and diffuse climate change mitigation and/or adaptation technologies in developing countries. Their methodology includes a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework but, although many countries already conducted a TNA, literature lacks discussions on country-specific processes for a TNA, as it usually follows a one-size-fits-all approach. This paper provides empirical evidence on the importance of country-driven processes that help shaping international programmes into country-specific needs and capabilities. It presents lessons learned from a tailored process for identification, prioritization, and selection of mitigation technologies in the scope of a TNA project for Brazil, an exceptional case of a developing country with strong capacity in integrated assessment modelling (IAM) scenarios for guiding its climate strategies. A previous IAM scenario result allowed pre-selecting technologies in six key economic sectors, while other TNAs prioritized no more than three. This allowed the elaboration of an overall ranking from the MCDA, in contrast to sectoral rankings that are mostly employed in other countries' TNAs. The overall ranking serves not only as a basis for the selection of priority technologies but also provides information on the integrated innovations framework for climate technologies in the country. Further specific findings of the tailored Brazilian TNA approach are discussed in the paper in order to call for the importance that a technology transfer project should not only be country-driven but also conducted through a country-specific process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available