4.5 Article

Assessment of the Natural Fiber Reinforced Bio-Polyethylene Composites Flexural Macro and Micromechanical Properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages 15574-15584

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2022.2131306

Keywords

Biocomposites; injection molding; micromechanical analysis; flexural properties; natural fibers; interface analysis

Funding

  1. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the flexural strength and modulus of a bio-polyethylene reinforced with thermos-mechanical fibers from corn stover, and evaluates the contribution of the reinforcements to the properties of the composite using modified rules of mixtures. The study shows that the coupling agent content has a significant impact on the strength of the composites. The results suggest the potential of fully bio-based composites as substitutes for oil-based polymers and partially bio-based materials.
One of the most common load modes is flexure. The paper measures and models the flexural strength and modulus of a bio-polyethylene reinforced with thermos-mechanical fibers from corn stover. Moreover, the authors use modified rules of mixtures to evaluate the contribution of the reinforcements to the properties of the composite. It was found a high impact of coupling agent content on the strength of the composites, and materials with a 6% of such agent and 50% of reinforcement increased 181% the strength of the matrix, and 464% its modulus. The obtained values are noticeable higher than polypropylene and some of its composites. Micromechanics analysis shows that the effect of natural fiber reinforcement on the flexural properties of a bio-based PE is similar to the effects on a polyolefin. Thus, the use of fully bio-based composites can be proposed as a substitute for some oil-based polymers, partially bio-based materials, and their composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available