Journal
VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14091977
Keywords
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; ADP-ribose; cyclic ADP-ribose; RNA polymerase; anti-phage systems; RNA repair; nucleotides; virus evolution; NADase; ADP-ribosyltransferase; sirtuin
Categories
Funding
- Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Library of Medicine
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study provides a comprehensive investigation of the NAD(+)-ADPr networks in virus-host conflicts and reveals their importance in viral replication and evasion. The findings suggest that these networks have been widely exploited by RNA and DNA viruses, and there is a selection for genes encoding NAD(+)-ADPr-utilizing domains across the viral world.
NAD(+) and ADP-ribose (ADPr)-containing molecules are at the interface of virus-host conflicts across life encompassing RNA processing, restriction, lysogeny/dormancy and functional hijacking. We objectively defined the central components of the NAD(+)-ADPr networks involved in these conflicts and systematically surveyed 21,191 completely sequenced viral proteomes representative of all publicly available branches of the viral world to reconstruct a comprehensive picture of the viral NAD(+)-ADPr systems. These systems have been widely and repeatedly exploited by positive-strand RNA and DNA viruses, especially those with larger genomes and more intricate life-history strategies. We present evidence that ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs), ADPr-targeting Macro, NADAR and Nudix proteins are frequently packaged into virions, particularly in phages with contractile tails (Myoviruses), and deployed during infection to modify host macromolecules and counter NAD(+)-derived signals involved in viral restriction. Genes encoding NAD(+)-ADPr-utilizing domains were repeatedly exchanged between distantly related viruses, hosts and endo-parasites/symbionts, suggesting selection for them across the virus world. Contextual analysis indicates that the bacteriophage versions of ADPr-targeting domains are more likely to counter soluble ADPr derivatives, while the eukaryotic RNA viral versions might prefer macromolecular ADPr adducts. Finally, we also use comparative genomics to predict host systems involved in countering viral ADP ribosylation of host molecules.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available