4.6 Review

ME-NBI combined with endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing and staging the invasion depth of early esophageal cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02809-6

Keywords

Magnifying endoscopy; Narrow band imaging; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Early esophageal cancer; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Suqian Sci Tech Program [S201620]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) plus endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may be an adequate diagnostic and staging modality for esophageal cancer (EC), but more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to confirm its diagnostic accuracy.
Background Several methods can assist in detecting early esophageal cancer (EEC) and staging esophageal cancer (EC) invasion depth. Objective To evaluate the accuracy of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) plus endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for diagnosing EC. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for relevant studies. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QADAS2) was used to assess the studies' methodological quality. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood (LR+), negative likelihood (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Results Seven studies were included. The meta-analysis suggested that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR of ME-NBI plus EUS for diagnosing EC were 0.947 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.901-0.975), 0.894 (95% CI, 0.847-0.931), 7.989 (95% CI, 4.264-14.970), 0.066 (95% CI, 0.035-0.124), and 137.96 (95% CI, 60.369-315.27), respectively. Those values for staging the invasive depth were 0.791 (95% CI, 0.674-0.881), 0.943 (95% CI, 0.906-0.968), 13.087 (95% CI, 7.559-22.657), 0.226 (95% CI, 0.142-0.360), and 61.332 (95% CI, 27.343-137.57). The areas under the curves (AUCs) for diagnosis and staging were 0.97 and 0.95, respectively. Conclusions ME-NBI plus EUS might be an adequate diagnostic and staging modality for EC. Due to the study limitations, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of ME-NBI plus EUS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available