4.5 Review

Recent developments in biosensing methods for extracellular vesicle protein characterization

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1839

Keywords

absorbance; acoustic resonators; biosensing; electrochemical; electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; fluorescence; interferometry; plasmon resonance; surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are widely regarded as a valuable source of biomarkers for human health and disease. However, their small size and complexity present challenges for effective characterization. This has led to the development of novel EV biosensing techniques to overcome these limitations.
Research into extracellular vesicles (EVs) has grown significantly over the last few decades with EVs being widely regarded as a source of biomarkers for human health and disease with massive clinical potential. Secreted by every cell type in the body, EVs report on the internal cellular conditions across all tissue types. Their presence in readily accessible biofluids makes the potential of EV biosensing highly attractive as a noninvasive diagnostic platform via liquid biopsies. However, their small size (50-250 nm), inherent heterogeneity, and the complexity of the native biofluids introduce challenges for effective characterization, thus, limiting their clinical utility. This has led to a surge in the development of various novel EV biosensing techniques, with capabilities beyond those of conventional methods that have been directly transferred from cell biology. In this review, key detection principles used for EV biosensing are summarized, with a focus on some of the most recent and fundamental developments in the field over the last 5 years. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > Biosensing Diagnostic Tools > In Vitro Nanoparticle-Based Sensing

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available