4.4 Article

Numerical simulation of arc and metal transfer behaviors in double-wire gas metal arc welding

Journal

WELDING IN THE WORLD
Volume 66, Issue 12, Pages 2521-2531

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40194-022-01381-7

Keywords

Coupled model; Numerical simulation; Gas metal arc welding; Double wire; Arc plasma; Metal transfer; Electromagnetic force distributions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005296]
  2. Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX22_1143]
  3. Graduate Innovation Program of China University of Mining and Technology [2022WLJCRCZL280]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The three-dimensional coupled arc-droplet models for traditional single-wire gas metal arc welding (SW-GMAW) and double-wire gas metal arc welding (DW-GMAW) were established to analyze the interaction of two arcs and droplet inclination in DW-GMAW. Temperature, fluid flow velocity, and electromagnetic force distributions were compared between DW-GMAW and SW-GMAW.
The three-dimensional coupled arc-droplet models for traditional single-wire gas metal arc welding (SW-GMAW) and double-wire gas metal arc welding (DW-GMAW) were established. The mutual attraction of two arcs and the inclination of the droplets in DW-GMAW were analyzed numerically. The temperature, fluid flow velocity, and electromagnetic force distributions were compared between DW-GMAW and SW-GMAW. Compared with SW-GMAW, the temperature distribution on the workpiece surface was bimodal along x-axis and the peak temperature reduced in DW-GMAW. The high-temperature region in the filler metal was decreased dramatically. The fluid flow mode of the arc plasma in DW-GMAW was changed, and the peak velocity of the arc plasma decreased. Besides, the forces acted on the arc plasma were compared and the reason for the arc inclination was analyzed. Experimental data was used to validate the model's predictions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available