4.7 Article

Adapting Irrigation Strategies to Mitigate Climate Change Impacts: A Value Engineering Approach

Journal

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Volume 37, Issue 6-7, Pages 2369-2386

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03353-4

Keywords

Climate Change; Irrigation; Strategies; Food security; Value Engineering; Life Cycle Cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a framework to select the most efficient irrigation strategy for mitigating the impacts of climate change and achieving food security. It utilizes value engineering methodology and life cycle cost technique to provide different value alternatives for different crops, soil types, and irrigation systems. The study contributes to irrigation management research and provides policymakers with a tool to incorporate added value and functionality into their irrigation water policies.
Water scarcity and climate change are posing new challenges to irrigation management. Climate change increases water demand and decreases crop yields. The aim of this paper is to propose a framework to select the most efficient irrigation strategy to mitigate the impacts of climate change and achieve food security. Value engineering (VE) methodology is utilized to assure the functionality of the strategy and add an element of creativity while creating the value alternatives. The life cycle cost (LCC) technique is utilized to provide the optimum irrigation strategy from an economic perspective. The findings showed three different value alternatives for different crops, soil types, and irrigation systems. This paper contributes to the current state of knowledge by a) utilizing the Value Engineering methodology in irrigation management studies; b) evaluating irrigation strategies to ensure efficient irrigation water management; and c) providing policymakers with a tool to incorporate the added value and functionality into their policies regarding irrigation water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available