4.7 Article

Effect of support type and crystal form of support in the catalytic gasification of old corrugated containers using Fe-based catalysts

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 163-170

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.003

Keywords

Solid waste; Catalytic gasification; Fe-based catalyst; Support; Mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006086, 52076100]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1901204]
  3. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCB2001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically investigated the effect of support type and crystal form in Fe-based catalysts on the catalytic gasification of old corrugated containers. The results showed that Fe/TiO2 had the highest catalytic activity for H-2 production, while Fe/gamma-Al2O3 had the best H-2 selectivity and good H-2 yield.
Catalytic gasification of old corrugated containers with Fe-based catalysts is a promising way to produce renewable H-2 along with the utilization of solid waste. In this study, the effect of support type and crystal form of support in Fe-based catalysts on the catalytic gasification of old corrugated containers was systematically investigated. The results show that, the introduction of Fe/gamma-Al2O3, Fe/TiO2, Fe/SiO2, and Fe/ZSM5-30 promote H-2 production. Among them, Fe/TiO2 has the highest catalytic activity on H-2 yield (25.10 mmol/g) related to the formation of Fe2TiO5 solid-melt material. Fe/gamma-Al2O3 shows the best H-2 selectivity (46.34 %) and good H-2 yield (24.19 mmol/g) due to good dispersity of Fe. Further, the order of catalytic effect on H-2 selectivity is Fe/ amorphous Al2O3 (51.46 %) > Fe/alpha-Al2O3 (46.98 %) > Fe/gamma-Al2O3 (46.34 %). With the increase in cycle index, Fe/amorphous Al2O3 shows the best catalytic effect on H-2 yield (25.56 mmol/g) after 11 indexes due to the formation of Al2FeO4. Fe/gamma-Al2O3 shows the best stability on H-2 selectivity (similar to 43 %) after 11 indexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available