4.3 Review

Updates on eosinophilic disorders

Journal

VIRCHOWS ARCHIV
Volume 482, Issue 1, Pages 85-97

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03402-8

Keywords

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia; Tyrosine kinase gene fusion; ETV6::ABL1; FLT3 rearrangement; Chronic eosinophilic leukemia; NOS; Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the changes and updates in eosinophilic disorders under the International Consensus Classification (ICC), providing updated understanding and guidance for accurate diagnosis and differentiation.
This review addresses changes and updates in eosinophilic disorders under the International Consensus Classification (ICC). The previous category of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and a specific gene rearrangement is changed to M/LN-eo with tyrosine kinase gene fusions to reflect the underlying genetic lesions. Two new members, M/LN-eo with ETV6::ABL1 fusion and M/LN-eo with various FLT3 fusions, have been added to the category; and M/LN-eo with PCM1::JAK2 and its genetic variants ETV6:: JAK2 and BCR:: JAK2 are recognized as a formal entity from their former provisional status. The updated understanding of the clinical and molecular genetic features of PDGFRA, PDGFRB and FGFR1 neoplasms is summarized. Clear guidance as to how to distinguish these fusion gene-associated disorders from the overlapping entities of Ph-like B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), de novo T-ALL, and systemic mastocytosis is provided. Bone marrow morphology now constitutes one of the diagnostic criteria of chronic eosinophilic leukemia, NOS (CEL, NOS), and idiopathic hypereosinophilia/hypereosinophilic syndrome (HE/HES), facilitating the separation of a true myeloid neoplasm with characteristic eosinophilic proliferation from those of unknown etiology and not attributable to a myeloid neoplasm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available