4.7 Article

Microstructure and tribological performances of M50 bearing steel processed by ultrasonic surface rolling

Journal

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107818

Keywords

Ultrasonic surface rolling; Bearing steel; Microhardness; Tribological performances

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52175250]
  2. National United Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Bearing Tribology of Henan University of Science and Technology [202208]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [222300420141]
  4. Henan Key Laboratory of High-performance Bearings [2020ZCKF03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the use of ultrasonic surface rolling process (USRP) to improve the service life of M50 steel main shaft bearing. The results show that USRP treatment forms a plastic deformation layer, enhances microhardness and residual stress, and improves surface roughness. Compared to untreated samples, USRP samples exhibit lower friction coefficient and wear rate, with a shift in the main wear mechanism towards slight adhesive wear.
To prolong service life of M50 steel for the main shaft bearing, ultrasonic surface rolling process (USRP) was utilized to improve surface performances. The effects of USRP on surface integrity and tribological behavior were investigated. The results show the effect of USRP parameters on surface performances follows the order: feed rate > load > rolling times. During the USRP treatment, plastic deformation layer with 24 mu m thickness is formed, and fine grain strengthening increases the microhardness (15.56%) and residual stress (79.61%) and decreases the surface roughness (-68.09%), respectively. Friction coefficient and wear rate of USRP sample are lower than those of untreated sample, because USRP helps form a smooth tribolayer and changes the main wear mechanism to slight adhesive wear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available