4.4 Editorial Material

Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment-experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial

Journal

TRIALS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06805-9

Keywords

Recruitment; Remote; Telephone; Eligibility; Cognitive screening; Older; MoCA; Community

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grant for Applied Research [RP-PG-0216-20003]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0216-20003] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers had to adapt their study procedures, including conducting remote recruitment and data collection. This article reflects on the experience of using the MoCA Blind/Telephone assessment during the initial telephone eligibility check for a randomized controlled trial with older people. The authors found that telephone administration of the MoCA posed challenges, such as uncertainty about the participants' difficulties in answering questions and practical difficulties in completing the assessment. They also discuss the potential impact on trial recruitment and participant engagement, as well as the feasibility of using videoconferencing for cognitive assessments.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic forced many research teams to adjust the way they conduct studies, including moving to remote delivery of some or all of their recruitment and data collection processes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used in research and is available in multiple formats for different groups and assessment settings. Here, we reflect on our experiences of administering the MoCA Blind/Telephone as part of the initial telephone eligibility check for participation in a randomised controlled trial with community-dwelling older people with frailty. Main body In response to COVID-19, a number of changes were made to the trial's screening and recruitment procedures, to minimise the amount of time the researchers would spend in the participants' homes when recruitment began in May 2021. One of the changes was for the researchers to conduct a cognitive assessment for eligibility during an initial telephone call, rather than during the subsequent home visit for consent and baseline data collection. We found that in comparison with conducting the assessment in-person, telephone administration caused uncertainty for the researchers about whether participants were struggling to answer questions due to cognition or hearing impairment. Some participants experienced practical difficulties when combining holding a telephone and completing one of the assessment items. It was hard for the researchers to judge the emotional impact that undertaking the assessment was having on the older people on the telephone, without visual warning signs of fatigue or mood. We discuss the potential impact of these issues on trial recruitment and participant engagement, and the feasibility of videoconferencing as an alternative method of conducting the MoCA. Conclusion The MoCA is a useful tool when cognitive impairment is part of screening and data collection and it is helpful to have the option to use the test remotely. However, as we have found, telephone testing is not always straightforward. Researchers should weigh up the pros and cons for each individual study, especially those involving older adults. If choosing remote methods, consider the practicality of using videoconferencing and think about the possible impact of telephone assessment on the relationship with the (potential) research participants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available