Journal
TRIALS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06794-9
Keywords
Digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS); Fetal blood sampling (FBS); Labour; Cardiotocography; Caesarean section; Randomised controlled trial
Categories
Funding
- Health Research Board of Ireland through the Definitive Interventions and Feasibility Awards (DIFA) 2019
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aims to compare the role of digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) and fetal blood sampling (FBS) as second-line tests in assessing fetal wellbeing and preventing operative delivery. A multi-centre parallel group randomised controlled trial is planned in Ireland, recruiting 2500 nulliparous women. The results of this study could have significant implications for global labor management.
Background Cardiotocography (CTG) is a screening test used to detect fetal hypoxia in labour. It has a high false positive rate resulting in many potentially unnecessary caesarean sections. Fetal blood sampling (FBS) is a second-line test of the acid-base status of the fetus. It is used to provide either reassurance that it is safe for labour to continue or objective evidence of compromise so that delivery can be expedited. Digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) to elicit a fetal heart rate acceleration is an alternative less invasive second-line test of fetal wellbeing. This study aims to provide robust evidence on the role of these two second-line tests in assessing fetal wellbeing and potentially preventing operative delivery. Methods A multi-centre parallel group randomised controlled trial (RCT) is planned in four maternity centres in Ireland. The study aims to recruit 2500 nulliparous women with a term (>= 37+0 weeks) singleton pregnancy who require a second-line test of fetal wellbeing in labour due to an abnormal CTG. Women will be allocated randomly to dFSS or FBS on a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is caesarean section. With 1250 women in each arm, the study will have 90% power to detect a difference of 5-6%, at a two-sided alpha significance level of 5%, assuming a caesarean section rate of at least 20% in the dFSS group. Discussion If the proposed study shows evidence that dFSS is a safe, reliable and effective alternative to FBS, this would have ground-breaking implications for labour management worldwide. It could potentially lead to a reduction in invasive procedures and emergency caesarean sections.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available